12.7 C
New York
Monday, May 20, 2024

Buy now

Monday, May 20, 2024

UDP leader emphasises scientific study before railway introduction in Khasi-Jaintia Hills

In Meghalaya, anti-influx groups strongly oppose introducing railways in the Khasi and Jaintia Hills region, citing the absence of effective mechanisms like the inner line permit (ILP) system to protect tribal indigenous people from being outnumbered by the influx and illegal immigration.

SHILLONG:

UDP leader and cabinet minister Paul Lyngdoh emphasised the necessity of conducting a scientific study and a cost-benefit analysis before deciding on the introduction of railways in the Khasi-Jaintia Hills region of the state.

“Before making a final decision, there are ways to address such issues. One approach is to conduct a scientific study and a cost-benefit analysis to understand the costs and benefits of introducing railways. We need to analyse these aspects,” Lyngdoh stated.

“In parallel, if the cost-benefit analysis supports the implementation of railways, we proceed to the next level, which involves confidence-building measures. This process should include all stakeholders, including NGOs. It should not be perceived as an ‘us versus them’ issue. We are all responsible leaders of Meghalaya, and we must work together to facilitate the state’s growth. Opposition has arisen from leaders in the Khasi-Jaintia sectors who speak the same language. I believe we can resolve issues through rational, scientific, mature, and wise discussions,” he added.

In Meghalaya, anti-influx groups strongly oppose introducing railways in the Khasi and Jaintia Hills region, citing the absence of effective mechanisms like the inner line permit (ILP) system to protect tribal indigenous people from being outnumbered by the influx and illegal immigration.

These groups have called on the state government and all political parties to abandon the railway idea. Instead, they urge a vigorous pursuit with the Centre for the implementation of ILP, along with a focus on development in education and other social sectors.

When asked about addressing influx in the absence of ILP resolution pending with the Centre and the return of MRSSAB, 2020 to the state, Lyngdoh suggested that a holistic approach, including a scientific cost-benefit analysis, could effectively tackle the issue.

“Any pending agendas should be resolved before making a final decision, especially with general elections approaching. I am confident that the Union government will make a final decision and inform the state government, as these measures require the concurrence of the central government,” he explained.

Meanwhile, Lyngdoh clarified that the party has not taken any decision to support railway projects in the Khasi-Jaintia Hills region. He mentioned that the recent statement supporting the introduction of goods trains was made by UDP general secretary Jemino Mawthoh in his individual capacity, as the matter was never brought before the CEC or any other committee of the UDP.

Related Articles

Stay Connected

146,751FansLike
12,800FollowersFollow
268FollowersFollow
80,400SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles